Case Results

On October 1, 2024, attorney Brian J. Prain secured a Not Guilty verdict for a client accused of Third Degree Criminal Sexual Conduct. Facing up to 15 years in prison and lifetime sex offender registration, our client had endured over eight years of uncertainty after being wrongfully accused.

The case initially escalated to First Degree Criminal Sexual Conduct but was reduced after successful appeals to the Michigan Court of Appeals and Supreme Court. At trial, expert testimony and strategic defense arguments led the jury to acquit our client, allowing him to move forward with his life free from the devastating consequences of a conviction.

In another major victory, attorney Brian J. Prain secured a Not Guilty verdict for a client accused of First Degree Criminal Sexual Conduct. The client faced life in prison based on allegations of sexual abuse by a stepchild. The case, which involved claims of "delayed disclosure" and challenging "other acts" evidence, required meticulous preparation and expert cross-examination of the prosecution's witnesses.

Despite the high stakes and serious charges, the jury found our client not guilty of all counts, reaffirming the importance of trial by jury in safeguarding individual rights and freedom.

In a recent case, attorney Brian J. Prain achieved a Not Guilty verdict for a client falsely accused of Second Degree Criminal Sexual Conduct. The client was accused of sexually abusing a stepdaughter, with claims surfacing years after the alleged incidents—coinciding with a pending divorce and custody dispute.

The jury considered the possibility of intentional lies or suggestive influences that could have led to unreliable accusations. Expert testimony on memory and suggestibility played a crucial role in the defense. After careful deliberation, the jury found the client not guilty, allowing him to finally move forward with his life.

In this case, we’ve omitted personal details to protect privacy, but it offers important lessons for anyone facing Michigan Criminal Sexual Conduct (CSC) charges.

The case involved meeting through a "hook-up" app, where the alleged victim claimed she was seeking friendship but later accused our client of sexual assault after an in-person meeting. The jury found our client Not Guilty, but the case highlights how regret and differing expectations in consensual encounters can lead to false accusations.

In Michigan CSC cases, convictions can occur based solely on the accuser’s testimony, without physical evidence. This makes defending such cases difficult, even for the innocent. Successful defense requires an experienced lawyer skilled in navigating these complex situations.

Michigan Criminal Sexual Conduct Attorney Brian J. Prain secured a NOT GUILTY verdict for a client charged with Second Degree Criminal Sexual Conduct. Here’s a brief overview of the case and its challenges:

The client was accused of sexually touching a person under age 13, facing two counts of Second Degree Criminal Sexual Conduct, which carries a maximum penalty of 15 years in prison. This charge involves illegal sexual contact without penetration and is part of Michigan's structured sex crime laws.

The prosecution frequently objected, creating obstacles for the defense. Additionally, pretrial rulings limited the evidence we could present, including past false allegations made by the accuser, which hindered the defense.

An expert was utilized to demonstrate the context of the allegations, although not all CSC cases require one. This case exemplifies the complexities of defending against serious allegations, reinforcing the importance of experienced legal representation in navigating the legal system.

In March 2019, Michigan Criminal Sexual Conduct Defense Lawyer Brian J. Prain achieved a significant victory by securing a NOT GUILTY verdict on all counts of First and Second Degree Criminal Sexual Conduct in Oakland County Circuit Court. The case involved allegations from two minors accusing our client of serious offenses, including forcible rape, which could have resulted in a mandatory minimum sentence of 25 years in prison. Despite facing multiple charges, including First Degree CSC and Second Degree CSC, the client opted for trial rather than accepting a plea deal, maintaining his innocence throughout the process. Attorney Brian J. Prain skillfully demonstrated inconsistencies in the accusers' testimonies and provided a compelling defense strategy, ultimately leading to the acquittal.